Re: Searching GIN-index (FTS) and sort by timestamp-column
От | Evgeniy Shishkin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Searching GIN-index (FTS) and sort by timestamp-column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D77F27E4-3825-454F-B2CC-F91064E2FAF7@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Searching GIN-index (FTS) and sort by timestamp-column (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Searching GIN-index (FTS) and sort by timestamp-column
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> On 16 Mar 2016, at 16:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes: >> 1. Why isnt' folder_id part of the index-cond? > > Because a GIN index is useless for sorting. I don't see how gin inability to return sorted data relates to index condition. In fact i tried to reproduce the example, and if i change folder_id to int from bigint, then index condition with folder_id is used Index Cond: ((fts_all @@ '''hi'''::tsquery) AND (folder_id = 1)) > >> 2. Is there a way to make it use the (same) index to sort by >> received_timestamp? > > No. > >> 3. Using a GIN-index, is there a way to use the index at all for sorting? > > No. > >> 4. It doesn't seem like ts_rank uses the index for sorting either. > > Same reason. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: