Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs
От | Dustin Sallings |
---|---|
Тема | Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D6DB28FD-26F6-11D9-AD86-000A957659CC@spy.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Oct 25, 2004, at 13:53, Anjan Dave wrote: > I am dealing with an app here that uses pg to handle a few thousand > concurrent web users. It seems that under heavy load, the INSERT and > UPDATE statements to one or two specific tables keep queuing up, to > the count of 150+ (one table has about 432K rows, other has about > 2.6Million rows), resulting in ‘wait’s for other queries, and then > everything piles up, with the load average shooting up to 10+. Depending on your requirements and all that, but I had a similar issue in one of my applications and made the problem disappear entirely by serializing the transactions into a separate thread (actually, a thread pool) responsible for performing these transactions. This reduced the load on both the application server and the DB server. Not a direct answer to your question, but I've found that a lot of times when someone has trouble scaling a database application, much of the performance win can be in trying to be a little smarter about how and when the database is accessed. -- SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: