Re: add_path optimization

On 2 Feb 2009, at 14:50, Robert Haas wrote:

>> well, true - but also, statically allocated table, without any  
>> predefined
>> size (with #DEFINE) , and no boundary check - is bad as well.
>> I suppose , this code is easy enough to let it be with your  
>> changes, but I
>> would still call it not pretty.
>
> Well, it might merit a comment.
:)

>
> What I'd really like to do is develop some tests based on a publicly
> available dataset.  Any suggestions?


I would say, it wouldn't hurt to do benchmarking/profiling regression  
tests on real hardware - but someone will have to generate quite  
substantial amount of data, so we could test it on small queries, up  
to 20+ join/sort/window function/aggregation queries, with various  
indexes, and data types. The more real the data, the better.
I could make some of my stuff public - but without the lookup tables  
(id->some real data -  like, names, surnames, mac addr, etc).