Re: Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend.
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D5856104-9F0F-11D8-BE4C-000A95AB279E@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend. (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend.
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On 5-May-04, at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I disagree. I think swiching between single quote and $$ based on the > content is just too confusing. I would just use $$ in all cases unless > $$ appears in the function (which should be rare), in which case I > would > use $quote$ or something generic. Well, the function definition in CREATE FUNCTION is a string literal like any other. Based on the reasoning above, would you argue for using $$ for every other string literal in the documentation rather than single quotes? If not, then we're not being consistent anyway, so I don't find the argument very convincing. Why not use whatever quoting mechanism is clearest for a particular example? In some cases that will be single-quotes, in others it will be dollar quoting via $$, and in still others it will be dollar quoting via $tag$ -Neil
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: