Re: Postgresql Hardware - Recommendations
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql Hardware - Recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D5550E881896C946B5D2524C265CF95B2272FE@aut-vie-w3s006.bankgutmann.co.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgresql Hardware - Recommendations (<Christian.Kastner@gutmann.at>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Andrew, Matthew, thanks to you both four your advice. I'm sorry I couldn't provide more details to the situation, I willpost again as soon I get them. Time to share your insights with the colleagues :) Best Regards, Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Paul Ramsey [mailto:pramsey@refractions.net] Gesendet: Dienstag, 06. September 2005 06:13 An: Kastner Christian; Kastner Christian Betreff: Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql Hardware - Recommendations For a database, I would almost always prioritize: - I/O - RAM - CPU So, fast drives (SCSI 10000RPM or better in a RAID configuration, more spindles == more throughput), then memory (more memory == more of the database off disk in cache == faster response), then more CPU (more concurrent request handling). Paul On 5-Sep-05, at 6:50 AM, <Christian.Kastner@gutmann.at> <Christian.Kastner@gutmann.at> wrote: > Hello, > > My company has decided to migrate our Oracle database to > postgresql8. We > will aquire a new server for this, and would very much appreciate your > advice. > > NOTE: The applications accessing the database are developed and > maintained externally, and unfortunately, the developers have not yet > given us detailed information on their requirements. The only info > I can > give so far is that the database size is about 60GB, and that it > will be > frequently accessed by multiple users (about 100 will be connected > during business hours). The applications accessing the database are > mostly reporting tools. > > I know that the performance question will ultimately boil down to "it > depends what you want to do with it", but at the moment I'm very much > interested if there are any general issues we should look out for. > > The questions we are asking us now are: > > 1) Intel or AMD (or alternate Platform) > Are we better of with Xeons or Opterons? Should we consider the IBM > OpenPower platform? > > 2) CPUs vs cache > Would you rather have more CPUs or more cache? Eg: 4x Xeon 1MB vs 2x > Xeon 8MB > > 3) CPUs vs Memory > Would you rather have 4x CPUs and 8GB of memory, or 2x CPUs with > 16GB of > memory? > > Thanks in advance for all your replies! > > Best Regards, > Christian Kastner > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: