Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?
| От | Dann Corbit |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D34C@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
A general purpose log miner is also useful in many other areas besides replication.
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: Darcy Buskermolen; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tom Lane; Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOOKS for Synchronous Replication?
On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more valuable to
provide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-trigger-based
replication? (As well as non-trigger-based materialized views...)
If we're going to do hooks for replication, I think we should look at including xlog. Trigger-based replication is an OLTP performance killer if you're just looking to do async replication.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: