Re: Oracle buys Innobase
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D19C@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Oracle buys Innobase ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle buys Innobase
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Consider what happened to Stak verse MS. Stak won the court case but still went out of business. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Fetter [mailto:david@fetter.org] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:17 AM > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Dann Corbit; snacktime; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:47:31PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Stupid question here, but how susceptible is Oracle to "monopolistic > > practices", similar to what M$ is going through with the DoJ in the > > US? This seems to be *very* close to the line, if it isn't over it > > ... no? > > It may well be, but somebody would have sue, and then they would have > to win against Oracle. I don't think that MySQL AB has the resources > to fight such a legal action, even assuming they'd win it. > > Cheers, > D > -- > David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ > phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 > > Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: