Re: Unique Index
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unique Index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F89441547055823@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Unique Index (Alex <alex@meerkatsoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unique Index
Re: Unique Index |
Список | pgsql-general |
True, but the standard says nothing about the creation of an index, so you can make it behave in any way that you see fit. -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:27 PM To: Dann Corbit Cc: vhikida@inreach.com; J. Greenlees; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unique Index On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Dann Corbit wrote: > Even at that, I think that being able to insert more than one null value > into a unique index should be considered as a bug (or diagnosed as an > error). AFAICT the UNIQUE constraint that it's used to model explicitly allows multiple NULLs in the spec so I don't see making it error as being terribly workable.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: