Re: Corrupt RTREE index
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Corrupt RTREE index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154705572A@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Corrupt RTREE index (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Corrupt RTREE index
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I suggest a warning (if there is not already one generated) on create index for rtree indexes so that users know that they are not fully supported. -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:14 PM To: Greg Stark Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt RTREE index Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > So you don't think this case is worth doing forensics on? If the problem goes away after REINDEX then I'll write it off as missing WAL support. rtree is not high enough on my list of priorities to justify more effort :-( regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: