Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F89441547055497@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:51 AM > To: Greg Stark > Cc: Merlin Moncure; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 > > > Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > > Is there anything technically hard in adding this functionality to > > libpq? It looks like it's just mechanically adding more > entry points > > to existing code. > > Well, (a) I ran out of time, and (b) I wasn't sure what the > most convenient API would be. Should we create something > that packages together a Parse and a Describe Statement, or > expose those as separate things? > > There's surely no technical difficulty once you've got some > consensus on what the API should look like. > > > The describe statement part could be much trickier but > DBD::Pg doesn't > > really need that for basic functionality. > > Doesn't it? I thought the problem was that they couldn't > find out what datatypes the parameters got resolved as. That > may not be important if they are happy with always shipping > text strings, but if they want to move over to using binary > transmission of parameter values then they gotta know the > parameter types. > > > I do wonder whether DBD::Pg is really best off using libpq. > > I was wondering that myself. Would they be able to implement > a pure-Perl driver if they ginned up their own protocol code? > It'd be a lot of work, of course, so I can understand that > they might not feel it's worth the trouble. > > > From what I'm reading now it seems the "read every record before > > returning" behaviour is rooted in the libpq interface. > > Right. Again that's probably something that could be handled > by exposing more/different API, but no one has stepped up to > design it. What about using ECPG as an interface for drivers? I wrote an ODBC driver for Rdb on OpenVMS using SQLMOD (which is [essentially] ECPG for Rdb) so that is a technique that should be able to provide the needed functionality. According to my understanding ECPG is now reentrant. Is that correct?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: