Re: INSERT or UPDATE
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154702962120@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INSERT or UPDATE ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT or UPDATE TRIGGER
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. Byrne [mailto:byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:43 PM > To: Dann Corbit > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [GENERAL] INSERT or UPDATE > > > On Mon, April 6, 2009 20:23, Dann Corbit wrote: > > > > > If a transaction involves rows where some succeed and some fail, > > all will roll back. If that is the desired behavior, or if all > > operations are singleton, then you won't see any problems. > > > > Do I understand correctly that this means that even if the function > "handles" a failed insert then if the function occurs inside a > transaction then that transaction fails and is rolled back > regardless? It depends on how it is handled. You could certainly (for instance) use a cursor and perform the operations one by one.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: