Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D1D2D51E3BE3FC4E98598248901F75940126988E@ausmail2k4.aus.pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:08:46 -0600, > Larry Rosenman <lrosenman@pervasive.com> wrote: >> The issue is folks that DON'T set reverse DNS, I.E. have generic >> rDNS set on their IP's. >> >> I've seen (in my ISP days, and on my mailserver) LOTS of folks that >> can't/won't update Their rDNS, even though it's a STATICLY assigned >> address. >> >> And, as an example, my house IP changes when the PPPoE moves, and I >> have a DynDns.org Hostname that changes to support that, as well as >> a CNAME out of my domain to Point to it. > > Business class (or Speakeasy) broadband connections will generally > allow you to have custom PTR records for static IP addresses. When > using broadband for sheep, the ssh tunnel idea is probably a better > solution. > Understood. I was just pointing out the issue. I have had to whitelist some of my mortgage brokers e-mail servers because they hadn't gotten rid of the generic rDNS for their mailserver. I just wanted the issue to be in the archives when/if people don't like whatever gets committed/ -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC. 12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY 3015 AUSTIN TX 78727-6531 Tel: 512.231.6173 Fax: 512.459.1309 Email: Larry.Rosenman@pervasive.com Web: www.pervasive.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: