Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D1B9B499-6C56-4D0D-B8F3-C82F22F43542@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 12/19/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I think we should just accept the strings case-insensitively, too. > > While acknowledging Peter's pedantically-correct points, I say +1 for > ease of use. +1. I spend some time walking people through tuning issues by phone or IM. Anything that complicates supporting users or frustrates users for no actual benefit is a bad thing. (And this is unrelated to any theoretical units-aware data type - we might well be interested in milliwatts and megawatts in a datatype, but in the configuration file we're unlikely to ever need to configure things in units of millibits). Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: