Re: [pgsql-advocacy] freecode.com
От | Marc Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] freecode.com |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D0B787AA-72E0-40CE-AE7C-8152F750869E@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] freecode.com (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] freecode.com
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Nov 22, 2013, at 11:00 , Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > On 11/22/2013 08:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> * Stefan Kaltenbrunner (stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc) wrote: >>> honestly - I would strongly vote on removing postgresql completely from >>> freecode(and related sites), we seem to struggle to update references on >>> external sites for years and years now and I don't think we actually >>> gain a lot (if at all) from maintaining our presence there. >> >> If that meant PG wouldn't actually show up on those sites, that'd be >> fine, but that's not how it works. *Someone else* will just end up >> posting about us up there when they figure out we're not listed or >> whatever, and then it'll end up in the same situation. > > well - afaik we stopped maintaining our sourceforge entry and that one > was taken over by SF directly and is now a) always updated and b) not a > problem any more. > > I consider that being a good thing if you look at the archives on -www > and -advocacy for that download^advertising platform. > considering that there is a release checklist, starting from packaging straight though to press releases, why isn’t thispart of that checklist in the first place? it gets sporatically maintained because nobody thinks about it … make it part of the checklist of what needs to be done atrelesae, and it will no longer be forgot …
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: