Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection
От | Tristan Partin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D0AKOPTFMKFK.3W2C0R3131MFF@neon.tech обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed Apr 3, 2024 at 9:50 AM CDT, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 16:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > If we do the latter, we will almost certainly get pushback from > > distros who check for library ABI breaks. I fear the comment > > suggesting that we could remove it someday is too optimistic. > > Alright, changed patch 0002 to keep the variant. But remove it from > the recently added switch/case. And also updated the comment to remove > the "for awhile". Removing from the switch statement causes a warning: > [1/2] Compiling C object src/bin/psql/psql.p/command.c.o > ../src/bin/psql/command.c: In function ‘wait_until_connected’: > ../src/bin/psql/command.c:3803:17: warning: enumeration value ‘PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch] > 3803 | switch (PQconnectPoll(conn)) > | ^~~~~~ -- Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: