RE: List of "servers" missing the new build machine?
От | Greg Clough |
---|---|
Тема | RE: List of "servers" missing the new build machine? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CY4PR03MB245541DFB7940A97A37F666AF7120@CY4PR03MB2455.namprd03.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: List of "servers" missing the new build machine? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
> I think this is the *only* case that this happens, except for one box that was > purchased with SPI money and is hosted at hosters expense. Every other > case has the same one. If it's just us, then I'd say forget about it. We're not greatly concerned about it, and would rather you spend time onbugs/features in PostgreSQL itself. > But yes, either making it two columns or making the one column take multiple > providers in it would probably make sense in general. If it's as simple as saying "EnterpriseDB/Ipreo" in a text field, then maybe that's an easy solution... but don't go upsettingEDB on our account. I don't want to overstep our bounds. > Then there's the general step of defining whatshould be on there. If now is the time to consider that, sure, but I presume it's not a very high-traffic page so don't let it distract you fromthe pending v11 release. Regards, Greg ********* Confidential Disclaimer ********* This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any attachmentsby anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notifyIpreo immediately by replying to this e-mail, and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments. If you havereceived this e-mail as part of a marketing communication and you would like to unsubscribe from future marketing communications,please review our privacy policy<http://info.ipreo.com/Ipreo-Private-Policy.html> for more information.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: