Re: meson: Stop using deprecated way getting path of files
| От | Tristan Partin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: meson: Stop using deprecated way getting path of files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CXFTYO2HO502.1LVU41KCXAXIU@neon.tech обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: meson: Stop using deprecated way getting path of files (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: meson: Stop using deprecated way getting path of files
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM CST, Tom Lane wrote: > "Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech> writes: > > On Fri Dec 1, 2023 at 12:16 PM CST, Tristan Partin wrote: > >>> Ok, so what I found is that we still have build farm animals using > >>> Python 3.4, specifically the AIX machines. There was also at least one > >>> Python 3.5 user too. Note that this was a manual check. > > > I think I'll probably work on a tool for querying information out of the > > build farm tonight to make tasks like this much more automated. > > Not sure what you were using, but are you aware that SQL access to the > buildfarm database is available to project members? My own stock > approach to checking on this sort of thing is like > > select * from > (select sysname, snapshot, unnest(string_to_array(log_text, E'\n')) as l > from build_status_log join snapshots using (sysname, snapshot) > where log_stage = 'configure.log') ss > where l like 'checking for builtin %' This looks useful. I had no idea about this. Can you send me any resources for setting this up? My idea was just to do some web scraping. -- Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: