Re: Further SPI
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Further SPI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CFB4C1CA-58F1-4B6B-A805-72C65AAD60C5@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Further SPI (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Apr 8, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Greg, > >> What we really need to do is accept PayPal. Yes, people have >> issues with >> them, they are Evil Incarnate, etc., but they are also the >> standard way of >> moving money around via the Internet, and I can only imagine that >> we are >> losing out of potential $$ by not including them. Using PayPal >> would also >> get around the current problem, but allowing a "single click to >> pay by >> credit card" option. > > We cannot used Paypal with the SPI bank account. Paypal was > previously used > in an attempt to commit fraud against SPI, so it will not be > accepted under > any circumstances. It's not a matter of political dislike; the > negligence of > Paypal staff can cost us hundreds or thousands of dollars and even > potentially embroil us in a donor suit. Dumb question: why does stuff have to go into an SPI account? Is there some reason why PGDG can't open an account somewhere? Sure, it won't be tax deductable, but I bet a lot of folks won't care. > Also, I'm very dubious about the claim that people will be willing > to donate > via Paypal who won't donate via Click-and-Pledge. At most, I > imagine that > we'd miss out on a couple hundred a year worth of donations from > people who > can't be bothered to fill out a web form. That's simply not worth > the risk. So why miss out on the "couple hundred a year"? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: