Interesting rant mentioning PostgreSQL...
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Interesting rant mentioning PostgreSQL... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CF31B756-CF6C-441C-95A6-0CC78A409E2C@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
http://blog.develix.com/frog/user/cliff/article/2006-06-04/9 I learned databases on MySQL and used it for several years. Then I discovered PostgreSQL and realized that in fact, I'd learned nothing of databases. For years the MySQL developers were quite vocal that things like referential integrity, transactions, subselects, etc were little more than baggage that could be done better another way. They were after speed, pure and simple. Fair enough, in some respect, since the job MySQL was originally developed for didn't require any of those things. The problem is that a whole generation of database programmers believed them, despite the fact that their applications *did* require those things. Someone in authority told them they didn't and they bought it (and still buy it). Let me clue you in: you need these things or you need to let someone else handle your database work for you. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: