Re: count(*) performance
От | Brendan Duddridge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: count(*) performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CE860B90-6CAB-441A-870B-397696599418@clickspace.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: count(*) performance ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: count(*) performance
Re: count(*) performance Re: count(*) performance |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Does that mean that even though autovacuum is turned on, you still should do a regular vacuum analyze periodically? Thanks, ____________________________________________________________________ Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brendan@clickspace.com ClickSpace Interactive Inc. Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE Calgary, AB T2G 0V9 http://www.clickspace.com On Mar 27, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Luke Lonergan wrote: > Gabriel, > > On 3/27/06 10:05 AM, "Gábriel Ákos" <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu> wrote: > >> That gave me an idea. I thought that autovacuum is doing it right, >> but I >> issued a vacuum full analyze verbose , and it worked all the day. >> After that I've tweaked memory settings a bit too (more fsm_pages) > > Oops! I replied to your disk speed before I saw this. > > The only thing is - you probably don't want to do a "vacuum full", but > rather a simple "vacuum" should be enough. > > - Luke > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: