Re: [pgsql-www] Recognition Guidelines Patch
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Recognition Guidelines Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CD490989-3A60-43CB-BA90-B2301D7FF4F7@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Recognition Guidelines Patch (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] Recognition Guidelines Patch
Re: [pgsql-www] Recognition Guidelines Patch |
Список | pgsql-www |
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > >>> What would happen to the conference events already listed at >>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/event? Are they going to be removed >>> if the organizer of a conference does not agree with this? >> >> The guidelines for events are not about what is listed on the events page, those are available here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NewsEventsApproval#Approving_Events_and_Event-Related_News_.28excluding_training.29 <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NewsEventsApproval#Approving_Events_and_Event-Related_News_.28excluding_training.29> > > Isn't that for approving posts to pgsql-announce? And what goes on the events page on .org. This the guide I have been using for X years I have been helping to moderate. > >> The guidelines are for recognizing what constitutes a *community* event versus an event about PostgreSQL, i.e. this sentence: >> >> > Events that do not meet the criteria will still be welcomed (where appropriate under the general listing policies)- >> > for example, events organised by a single company which may still be valuable for people to attend, but are >> > not necessarily what we would consider fully “open.” >> >> Best, >> >> Jonathan >> > >> As I understand it, no. It appears that instead there will essentially >> be two classes of conferences. >> >> 1. Recognized .Org conferences (those that follow the .Org guidelines) >> >> 2. Everyone else (who would still be subject to the event posting >> rules but not subject to the "Recognized" .Org conference guidelines. > > So, "community event" constitutes #1 and will be on the website > different from what we have now? Nothing is changing on what is being published to the website right now, it is still following the aforementioned link Iposted. Thanks, Jonathan
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: