Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
От
David E. Wheeler
Тема
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
Дата
Msg-id
CB66B656-C6DB-42C4-B70D-78DB0631D49F@kineticode.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable
resolution Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward
compatibility? Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release
skipped backward compatibility? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility? Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > 1. Invent a GUC that has the settings backwards-compatible, > oracle-compatible, throw-error (exact spellings TBD). Factory > default, > at least for a few releases, will be throw-error. Make it SUSET so > that > unprivileged users can't break things by twiddling it; but it's still > possible for the DBA to set it per-database or per-user. > > 2. Also invent a #option syntax that allows the GUC to be overridden > per-function. (Since the main GUC is SUSET, we can't just use a > per-function SET to override it. There are other ways we could do > this > but none seem less ugly than #option...) What about adopting the modifier syntax you're adding to COPY? David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления