Re: [PATCH] /src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, tiny improvements
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] /src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, tiny improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CB1EC25A-A595-420C-8DF9-A7DDB02C0470@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] /src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, tiny improvements (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] /src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, tiny improvements
Re: [PATCH] /src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, tiny improvements |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote: > > 3. At function KeepLogSeg (line 9357) the test if (slotSegNo <= 0), the var slotSegNo is uint64 and not can be < 0. There is something unusual about comparing a XLogSegNo variable in this way, but it seems to go back to 2014 when the replicationslots were introduced in commit 858ec11858a914d4c380971985709b6d6b7dd6fc, and XLogSegNo was unsigned then, too. Depending on how you look at it, this could be a thinko, or it could be defensive programming against future changesto the XLogSegNo typedef. I’m betting it was defensive programming, given the context. As such, I don’t think itwould be appropriate to remove this defense in your patch. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: