Re: 57 minute SELECT
От | Samuel Stearns |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 57 minute SELECT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CB03CD8D2C3F9347BAFEC8EA9DD89C9318D392D9@ISP-OSB-DAG2.win2k.iinet.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 57 minute SELECT (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Thanks for all the advice here. I'll look at setting up something in a test environment and play with the clustering. Testinghow other queries perform against the clustering, also. Thank you! Sam -----Original Message----- From: David Kerr [mailto:dmk@mr-paradox.net] Sent: Friday, 4 October 2013 1:55 AM To: Samuel Stearns Cc: Claudio Freire; David Johnston; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 57 minute SELECT On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:20:52AM -0700, David Kerr wrote: - On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:47:29AM +0000, Samuel Stearns wrote: - - Thanks, Claudio: - - - - http://explain.depesz.com/s/WJQx - - You're spending a lot of time in the hash join which can kill a system with - low ram. - - You may, just for fun, want to try the query with enable_hashjoin=false. Sorry, ignore that, more coffe before mailing lists for me.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: