Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvznd2bfykLSYYE0LL+1WiiDp8FtpVWxfZ_Ty_Rq23Y-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > I tool a look at this patch. It looks good for me. It applies > > cleanly on last master, builds without warnings, passes tests. > > Functionality seems to be well-covered by documentation and regression > > tests. So, I'm going to commit it if no objections. > > AFAIR, the argument was mainly over whether we agreed with the proposed > behavioral changes. It seems a bit premature to me to commit given that > there's not consensus on that. Ok. I've briefly looked to the thread, and I thought there is consensus already. Given your concern, I'll investigate this thread in detail and come up with summary. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: