Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvwp7cBWs=iBv7zc7e9NOWQf0TmcwNNzw=--H1qFoBcNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN (Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 8:40 AM Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Thanks for such detailed feedback! > The rationale for this patch was to give the optimizer additional ways > to push down more joins into foreign servers. And, because of > asynchronous append, the benefit of that optimization was obvious. > Unfortunately, we hadn't found other applications for this feature, > which was why this patch was postponed in the core. > You have brought new ideas about applying this idea locally. Moreover, > the main issue of the patch was massive memory consumption in the case > of many joins and partitions - because of reparameterization. But now, > postponing the reparameterization proposed in the thread [1] resolves > that problem and gives some insights into the reparameterization > technique of some fields, like lateral references. > Hence, I think we can restart this work. > The first thing here (after rebase, of course) is to figure out and > implement in the cost model cases of effectiveness when asymmetric join > would give significant performance. Great! I'm looking forward to the revised patch. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: