Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvnuearoPByUC9pUq37BsgJDgj5b3QztF6FSxpHrxfDnA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 8:12 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes: > > On 10/26/23 16:01, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > >> My fuzzer finds a bug in Postgres, which triggers an unexpected error. > > > This bisects to d3d55ce571369dad6e1d582f1655e5a3fbd8594a, Remove useless > > self-joins. > > I wonder if that new code thinks it can remove ref_2 from the query, > even though ref_2 is used in the targetlist. I'm not seeing > control reach remove_leftjoinrel_from_query, though. > > Also, while nosing around in this, I tried to pprint(root) at the > point of the error, and got > > 2023-10-26 12:48:37.852 EDT [1186007] WARNING: could not dump unrecognized node type: 37413808 > > This happens because the patch changed RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels from > a list of Bitmapsets into a list of UniqueRelInfo, even though it did > not bother to make UniqueRelInfo be a Node type (much less document > the change in globally-visible data structures: pathnodes.h still says > it's a list of Relid sets). This is not acceptable. > > I'm getting the distinct impression that this patch wasn't > ready for prime time. Please, give me a chance to fix this shortly. If that wouldn't be an easy fix, I will revert. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: