Re: unnesting multirange data types
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvgmQwSHeFVuNofdmU1ti1GUkBza5qJoKEVwNjcqiLkpw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unnesting multirange data types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > > I did run "check-world", but it passed for me. Probably the same > > reason it passed for some buildfarm animals... > > The only buildfarm animals that have passed since this went in > are the ones that don't run the pg_dump or pg_upgrade tests. > > It looks to me like the proximate problem is that you should > have taught pg_dump to skip these new auto-generated functions. > However, I fail to see why we need auto-generated functions > for this at all. Couldn't we have done it with one polymorphic > function? > > I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully. Thank you for your feedback. I've reverted the patch. I'm going to have closer look at this tomorrow. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: