Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvfwDV73kWAkJjzBfUmu89q1oFTnEP-s2BMHL4_wzKdmQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:55 PM Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote: > On 7/29/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > * like_regex predicate uses our regular expression engine, which > > deviates from standard. > > I still favor adding some element to the syntax (like a 'posix' or 'pg' > keyword in the grammar for like_regex) that identifies it as using > a different regexp flavor, so the way forward to a possible compliant > version later is not needlessly blocked (or consigned to a > standard_conforming_strings-like experience). What do you think about renaming existing operator from like_regex to pg_like_regex? Or introducing special flag indicating that PostgreSQL regex engine is used ('p' for instance)? ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: