Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdvHSkUjBmEgXujHC4Vftp8xK_JrnwOtALqY2NZT9ZgvHw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~ (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:34 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2020-Jun-15, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > I have begun my annual study of WAL consistency across replays, and > > wal_consistency_checking = 'all' is pointing out at some issues with > > at least VACUUM and SPGist: > > FATAL: inconsistent page found, rel 1663/16385/22133, forknum 0, > > blkno 15 > > CONTEXT: WAL redo at 0/739CEDE8 for SPGist/VACUUM_REDIRECT: newest > > XID 4619 > > > > It may be possible that there are other failures, I have just run > > installcheck and this is the first failure I saw after replaying all > > the generated WAL on a standby. Please note that I have also checked > > 12, and installcheck passes. > > Umm. Alexander, do you an idea of what this is about? I don't have idea yet, but I'll check this out ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: