Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdv9RoHM8AAYxcLcHneiJOQC0GwA1QnFf8x255gDsvQW1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
On 01/24/2014 10:53 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:Ah right, fixed that too now.OK. What about previous fix in assert?
Good, now my test-suite passed. Results are so.
Time of operations
event | period
-----------------------+-----------------
index_build | 00:01:45.709546
index_build_recovery | 00:00:09
index_update | 00:05:45.732214
index_update_recovery | 00:01:17
search_new | 00:24:02.191049
search_updated | 00:26:54.122852
(6 rows)
Index sizes
label | size
---------------+-----------
new | 387547136
after_updates | 610877440
(2 rows)
Before compression results were following.
Time of operations
event | period
-----------------------+-----------------
index_build | 00:01:51.116722
index_build_recovery | 00:00:08
index_update | 00:05:12.124758
index_update_recovery | 00:01:43
search_new | 00:23:44.281424
search_updated | 00:25:41.96251
(6 rows)
Index sizes
label | size
---------------+------------
new | 884514816
after_updates | 1595252736
(2 rows)
So, we can see little regression. However, I'm not sure if it's very significant.
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: