Re: pgsql: Add support of multirange matching to the existing range GiST in
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add support of multirange matching to the existing range GiST in |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdv1Bi1kxStTebSz3A9K=cNdz6dEqisFTikji=xnYspg-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add support of multirange matching to the existing range GiST in (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add support of multirange matching to the existing range GiST in
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:53:14PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:45 PM Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org> wrote: > >> Add support of multirange matching to the existing range GiST indexes > > > > I accidentally squash here a commit which implements GiST multirange > > indexes. That commit was intended to go separately with its own > > commit message below. Sorry for that. > > The buildfarm got a bit angry after this commit: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=clam&dt=2020-12-30%2003%3A00%3A11 > > Here is a diff from member clam, that uses ppc64: > select count(*) from test_multirange_gist where mr <@ > int4range(10,50); > - count > -------- > - 500 > -(1 row) > - > +ERROR: unknown multirange operator 4540 > > This points out to OID_RANGE_MULTIRANGE_CONTAINED_OP. Thank you for pointing this out. I'll investigate this. > Please note that you should add a "Discussion:" in those commits to be > able to track down where this stuff has been discussed. My oversight, sorry. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: