Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdv0EaWWF=zbd7QpxogNDMX2sU4VYYEqyy2hy6gSFt_Q=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
On 2017-02-21 16:57:36 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Yes, there is still some regression however it has come down by a
> small margin. I am not doing initdb for each run instead I am doing,
> dropdb-->createdb-->pgbench -i. Is dropping old database and creating
> a new one for every run not okay, Do I have to do initdb every time.
> Okay, I can change the order of reading and let you know the results.
That does make a difference. Primarily because WAL writes in a new
cluster are a more expensive than in an old one, because of segment
recycling.
+1
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: