Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfduwDL29rGb_ONKwAsmq6bfMRgP+y+QkZJFUWuv2rDpb4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander, Maxim, Thank you for revisions. On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:22 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote: > Aleksander Alekseev, > > > Maxim, > > I see both of us accounted for Alexanders feedback and submitted v59. > > Your newer version seems to have issues on cfbot, so resubmitting the > > previous patchset that passes the tests. Please feel free to add > > changes. > > For unknown reasons, I do not receive any of your emails from after 2023-11-07 11:57:12 (Message-ID: CAJ7c6TN1hKqNPGrNcq96SUyD=Z61raKGXF8iqq36qr90oudxRg@mail.gmail.com). > Even after resend. > > Anyway, PFA patch set of version 61. I've made some minor changes in the 0001 and add 004 in order to test actual 64-bitSLRU pages. > > As for CF bot had failed on my v59 patch set, this is because of the bug. It's manifested because of added 64-bit pagestests. > The problem was in segno calculation, since we convert it from file name using strtol call. But strtol return long, > which is 4 byte long in x86. > > - segno = (int) strtol(clde->d_name, NULL, 16); > + segno = strtoi64(clde->d_name, NULL, 16); v61 looks good to me. I'm going to push it as long as there are no objections. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: