Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
| От | Alexander Korotkov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAPpHfduns_j0jn2VGXvwDLP31dUXYU=3WCC31DzkG_Qe5WDFbQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, page-level predicate locking should happen only when fast update is off.Actually, I forgot to put conditions in updated patch. Does everything else look ok ?
I think that isolation tests should be improved. It doesn't seems that any posting tree would be generated by the tests that you've provided, because all the TIDs could fit the single posting list. Note, that you can get some insight into GIN physical structure using pageinspect contrib.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.
The Russian Postgres Company
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: