Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdunCKv7Rg6wcj4A-kiXuBuAGn=oDbE6MnpFEhxh42EbTA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, John! On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:44 AM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:23 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are some places, which potentially could cause a slowdown. I'm > > going to make some experiments with that. > > I haven't looked at the patches, so I don't know of a specific place to look for a slowdown, but I thought it might helpto perform the same query tests as my most recent test for evaluating qsort variants (some description in [1]), and hereis the spreadsheet. Overall, the differences look like noise. A few cases with unabbreviatable text look a bit fasterwith the patch. I'm not sure if that's a real difference, but in any case I don't see a slowdown anywhere. > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsHeTACMP1JVQ%2Bm35-v2NkmEqsJMHLhEfWk4sTB5aw_jkQ%40mail.gmail.com Great, thank you very much for the feedback! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: