Re: jsonpath
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonpath |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdue-pzzEVK+zoY6sbqG4LYC3JvW7-j8J78EqT-TOLdNiw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonpath (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonpath
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:15 PM Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:43 PM Andrew Dunstan > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 3/28/19 9:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > >> On March 28, 2019 9:31:14 AM EDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > >>> Has anybody gotten through a valgrind run on this code yet? > > >> Skink has successfully passed since - but that's x86... > > > Yeah, there is a depressingly high chance that this is somehow specific > > > to the bison version, flex version, and/or compiler in use on jacana. > > > > lousyjack has also passed it (x64). > > > > git bisect on jacana blames commit 550b9d26f. > > Hmm... 550b9d26f just makes jsonpath_gram.y and jsonpath_scan.l > compile at once. I've re-read this commit and didn't find anything > suspicious. > I've asked Andrew for access to jacana in order to investigate this myself. Thanks to Andrew I got access to jacana and made some investigation. At first, I found that existence of separate jsonpath_gram.h doesn't influence the situation. If have jsonpath_gram.h generated, test still fails if compile jsonpath_gram.c and jsonpath_scan.c together. But if build them separately, error is gone. Then I did following trick: build jsonpath_gram.c and jsonpath_scan.c separately, but copy contents of jsonpath_gram.c to the top of jsonpath_scan.c. I also renamed yyparse to yyparse2 in the copy of jsonpath_gram.c in order to make jsonpath_scan.c use another copy of this function defined in the separate file. Then test fails again. After that, I found if I remove contents of yyparse2 function, then test passes OK. See versions of jsonpath_scan.c attached. Thus, contents of unused function makes test fail or pass. So far, it looks like a compiler bug. Any thoughts? ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: