Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdttE3Cu8GZkVTK6pDH6bcYT9kejtLpjgkof9=k1ZtAQLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:I think unless such benchmarking is done in the next 24h we need to moveOn 2017-04-03 11:56:13 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Have you done x86 benchmarking?
this patch to the next CF...Thank you for your comments.I didn't x86 benchmarking. I even didn't manage to reproduce previous results on Power8.Presumably, it's because previous benchmarks were done on bare metal, while now I have to some kind of virtual machine on IBM E880 where I can't reproduce any win of Power8 LWLock optimization. But probably there is another reason.Thus, I'm moving this patch to the next CF.
I see it's already moved. OK!
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: