Re: [HACKERS] TRUE and true
| От | Alexander Korotkov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TRUE and true |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAPpHfdtsF13YM1jbKCDBrdeC2Da5vs9Ca6sL4rwRj6=h1ACZgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] TRUE and true (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TRUE and true
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Hello, I have a maybe-silly question.
What makes us have both TRUE/true or FALSE/false as constants of
bool?
The following definitions in c.h didn't mess anything up.
#define TRUE true
#define FALSE false
+1
I don't know any policy about where to use TRUE and FALSE over true and false.
# NIL seems causing similar mess.
NIL is used for lists, while NULL is used for other pointers.
That may cause redundant, but at least there is clear policy.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: