Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdtnTyqFYEpzLonprOp_+2vht_9tS2WJkSxbzSUSntBKeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
Yes, it looks better. I didn't notice we can use pg_describe_object() here.
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> SQL-query seems too huge for release notes and isn't looking for
> materialized view (fixable) and functional indexes with function which
> contains this operator somewhere inside (not fixable by this query). I
> think, just words is enough.
But the query can be made a little bit shorter and more comprehensible:
SELECT pg_describe_object(dep.classid, dep.objid, dep.objsubid)
FROM pg_catalog.pg_extension ext
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_depend edep ON edep.refobjid = ext.oid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_operator oper ON oper.oid = edep.objid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_depend dep ON dep.refobjid = oper.oid
WHERE
ext.extname = 'cube' AND
edep.refclassid = 'pg_catalog.pg_extension'::regclass AND
edep.classid = 'pg_catalog.pg_operator'::regclass AND
edep.deptype = 'e' AND
oper.oprname = '~>' AND
dep.refclassid = 'pg_catalog.pg_operator'::regclass
;
which returns the following
pg_describe_object
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────── ──────────────────────────
regla «_RETURN» en vista materializada f
índice tmp_idx
restricción «tmp_c_check» en tabla tmp
operador 15 (cube, integer) de familia de operadores gist_cube_ops para el método de acceso gist: ~>(cube,integer)
(4 filas)
(after
create materialized view f as select * from tmp where c~>1 > 1;
)
I think this is useful enough. The fact remains that we can't check
very well for functions; maybe suggest a LIKE clause to look for ~>
anywhere in function source code?
That's an option, but we should note that this check is inexact.
(It looks like you could get rid of the 'deptype' qual and
dep.refclassid also)
Since this bugfix should be backpatched to 9.6, there are patches for 9.6 and 10 too.
The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: