On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 5:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Personally I can see getting this in 18beta2 without too much additional
> > arguing for it. But for 15-17 you'd need a lot more support than is
> > evident in this thread.
>
> +1. The bar for causing plan changes in back branches is very high.
> Unless you can show that the buggy behavior is causing wrong answers,
> it's usually best to leave it alone.
Makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. I'll push this to the
master only.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase