Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdtS4RPw3XpNL2zbS+jipm9mx=4Nv6zvyEdR4fRPvb0wrw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Alvaro! Thank you for your care on this matter. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > BTW I noticed that > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c.gcov.html > says that lsn_cmp is not covered by the tests. This probably indicates > that the tests are a little too light, but I'm not sure how much extra > effort we want to spend. I'm aware of this. Ivan promised to send a patch to improve the test. If he doesn't, I'll care about it. > I'm still concerned that WaitLSNCleanup is only called in ProcKill. > Does this mean that if a process throws an error while waiting, it'll > not get cleaned up until it exits? Maybe this is not a big deal, but it > seems odd. I've added WaitLSNCleanup() to the AbortTransaction(). Just pushed that together with the improvements upthread. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: