Re: Postgres 11 release notes
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdtJJC9t17Zxd6WLAc9iSd5ip-SWZt8w-z0cqUwtwdbM6g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 11 release notes (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 11 release notes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:40 PM Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:15 PM Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 3:57 PM Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski > > <me@komzpa.net> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I'm not sure it is usefull in release notes since it is more about API, and not > > >> > user-facing change. Just in case. > > >> > GiST opclasses now can omit compress and decompress functions. If compress > > >> > function is omited, IndexOnlyScan is enabled for opclass without any extra > > >> > change. > > >> > https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/ > > >> > d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128 > > >> > > >> Uh, we do have this for SP-GiST: > > >> > > >> Allow SP-GiST indexes to optionally use compression (Teodor Sigaev, > > >> Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov) > > >> > > >> I am unclear how far downt the API stack I should go in documenting > > >> changes like this. > > > > > > > > > It is also a bit misleading - the idea in that change is that now index representation can be a lossy version of actualdata type (a box instead of polygon as a referende, so a changelog entry can tell "Allow SP-GiST index creation forpolygon datatype."). There is no "decompression" for such thing. "compression" sounds like gzip for me in user-facingcontext. > > > > +1 that current wording looks confusing. But I think we need to > > highlight that we have general SP-GiST improvement, not just support > > for particular datatype. So, I propose following wording: "Allow > > SP-GiST to use lossy representation of leaf keys, and add SP-GiST > > support for polygon type using that". > > Oh, I missed that we have separate release notes entry for polygons > indexing. Then second part of sentence isn't needed, it should be > just "Allow SP-GiST to use lossy representation of leaf keys". If no > objections, I'm going to commit that altogether with fixes by > Liudmila. Wording improvement is pushed. Typo fixes are already pushed by Magnus. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: