Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdt35iVsGdeZVD_Edw0zimxi6kZkczZ3ec0D_jAam_68Nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-04-06 20:39:26 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2018-04-06 12:22:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > And as Robert has reminded me often that committers do not possess a
> > > veto that they can simply use to remove patches, there have been no
> > > reasonable grounds to revoke anything.
> >
> > Nor does a single committer overrule three other committers raising
> > doubts. Without even xresponding to their concerns.
> >
>
> BTW, what had happend to the idea of RMT voting for reverting patches?
My understanding is that the RMT managed period only really starts after
the 7th, once feature frozen. And I think it's highly desirable to
attempt resolving disputes without resorting to such force, if possible.
Got it, thank you for the explanation.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: