Re: BUG #18261: Inconsistent results of SELECT affected by joined subqueries
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18261: Inconsistent results of SELECT affected by joined subqueries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdszEazFXUJXcDzPC=u9wWB__CnVGQKuaFr_8aY61yS4yg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18261: Inconsistent results of SELECT affected by joined subqueries (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:10 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:49 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 13:51 Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:32 AM Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >>> > >>> The regression test shows where two fully equal join clauses, applied on > >>> different join levels, differ by the only required_relids. It covers the > >>> problem and can be helpful by itself. IMO, one line in this test is > >>> redundant (see attachment). > >> > >> > >> Hmm, I don't think the insert statement in the test case is redundant. > >> It's needed to verify that the query in the test case gives the correct > >> result. Without the insert statement, the wrong plan would give the > >> same result as the correct plan, i.e., an empty set in this case. > >> > >> IMO, if we make some code changes and add a test case for that, we need > >> to ensure the test can give a different (and correct of course) result > >> than what came before. > > > > Thank you for pointing this. Yes, veryfying query result not just plan is strengthening the test. I'll recheck thisand push the fix later today. > > Pushed. Thanks again, Richard. I also noticed my indent oversight. Will fix that later today. https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=koel&dt=2024-01-08%2014%3A19%3A03 ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: