Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdsYTRWuR5YkadvB_G=JiBRLsYRAL7CJkpPiz3AitvhD6g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
On 01/17/2014 01:05 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:I'm looking into this now. A few quick notes:Seems to be fixed in the attached version of patch.
Another improvement in this version: only left-most segments and further
are re-encoded. Left part of page are left untouched.
* Even when you don't re-encode the whole page, you still WAL-log the whole page. While correct, it'd be a pretty obvious optimization to only WAL-log the modified part.
Oh, I overlooked it. I wrote code in ginRedoInsertData which finds appropriate place fro data but didn't notice that I still wrote whole page to xlog record.
* When new items are appended to the end of the page so that only the last existing compressed segment is re-encoded, and the page has to be split, the items aren't divided 50/50 on the pages. The loop that moves segments destined for the left page to the right won't move any existing, untouched, segments.
I think this loop will move one segment. However, it's too small.
! /*
! * Didn't fit uncompressed. We'll have to encode them. Check if both
! * new items and uncompressed items can be placed starting from last
! * segment of page. Then re-encode only last segment of page.
! */
! minNewItem = newItems[0];
! if (nolduncompressed == 0 &&
! ginCompareItemPointers(&olduncompressed[0], &minNewItem) < 0)
! minNewItem = olduncompressed[0];
That looks wrong. If I'm understanding it right, it's trying to do minNewItem = Min(newItems[0], olduncompressed[0]). The test should be "nolduncompressed > 0 && ..."
Yes, definitely a bug.
No need to send a new patch, I'll just fix those while reviewing...
Ok, thanks!
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: