Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdsLq51crn2ome7y5TMEh-HQaXVaXeQ-xO2Xt9h8MQn7NQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
2017-08-16 14:06 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:Hi2017-08-15 4:37 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>: On 3/11/17 07:06, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am sending a updated version with separated sort direction in special
> variable
This patch also needs a rebase.I am sending rebased patchrebased again + fix obsolete help
For me, patch applies cleanly, builds and passed regression tests.
However, patch misses regression tests covering added functionality.
Patch is definitely harmless, i.e. it doesn't affect anybody who doesn't use new functionality.
But I still would prefer ordering to be options of \d* commands while psql variables be defaults for those options...
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: