Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPmGK1732iHVjLRdEKqtTCaQbVg8+aazxEWHOhJmT3fyJ-ARbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: doc: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE .. PARTITION OF .. DEFAULT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:35 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:27 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 7:15 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Attached is a patch for that. > > > > > I think we should also rewrite the description to match the CREATE > > > TABLE's text, as in the attached updated patch. > > > > Actually, I thought the description would be OK as-is, because it says > > “See the similar form of CREATE TABLE for more details”, but I agree > > with you; it’s much better to also rewrite the description as you > > suggest. > > I would probably just update the synopsis. It's not very hard to > figure out what's likely to happen even without clicking through the > link, so it seems like it's just being long-winded to duplicate the > stuff here. But I don't care much if you feel otherwise. It looks like there are pros and cons. I think it’s a matter of preference, though. I thought it would be an improvement, but I agree that we can live without it, so I changed my mind; I'll go with my version. I think we could revisit this later. > > I’ll commit the patch unless Robert wants to. > > Please go ahead. OK Thanks! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: