Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPmGK16X4o+eOTon09u=RgOGCig4PvnRR0=daEmgz8pSdMoGJQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off (Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:02 PM Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com> wrote: > The commit[1] seems to break some queries in Citus[2], which is an extension which relies on set_join_pathlist_hook. > > Although the comment says /*Finally, give extensions a chance to manipulate the path list.*/ we use it to extract lotsof information about the joins and do the planning based on the information. > > Now, for some joins where consider_join_pushdown=false, we cannot get the information that we used to get, which preventsdoing distributed planning for certain queries. > > We wonder if it is possible to allow extensions to access the join info under all circumstances, as it used to be? Basically,removing the additional check: > > diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c > index 03b3185984..080e76cbe9 100644 > --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c > +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c > @@ -349,8 +349,7 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, > /* > * 6. Finally, give extensions a chance to manipulate the path list. > */ > - if (set_join_pathlist_hook && > - consider_join_pushdown) > + if (set_join_pathlist_hook) > set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, > jointype, &extra); Maybe we could do so by leaving to extensions the decision whether they replace joins with pseudoconstant clauses, but I am not sure that that is a good idea, because that would require the authors to modify and recompile their extensions to fix the issue... So I fixed the core side. I am not familiar with the Citus extension, but such pseudoconstant clauses are handled within the Citus extension? Thanks for the report! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: