Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPmGK15KFjpiHcu+fLVOJzH=41gTgTOqbbaUSwib1CKX0io69A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 4:17 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:41 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Seems to just need an update of the expected-file to account for test >> cases added recently. (I take no position on whether the new results >> are desirable; some of these might be breaking the intent of the case. >> But this should quiet the cfbot anyway.) > The test case was added by commit "Add support for asynchronous execution" > "27e1f14563cf982f1f4d71e21ef247866662a052" by Etsuro Fujita. He can comment > whether the new results are desirable or not. The new results aren't what I intended. I'll update the patch to avoid that by modifying the original test cases properly, if there are no objections. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: